EN BREF ...
"We audited publicly available details of regulated AI/ML algorithms in imaging from 2008 until April 2021. We reviewed 127 regulated software (118 AI/ML) to classify information related to their parent company, subspecialty, body area and specific anatomy type, imaging modality, date of FDA clearance, indications for use, target pathology (such as trauma) and findings (such as fracture), technique (CAD triage, CAD detection and/or characterization, CAD acquisition or improvement, and image processing/quantification), product performance, presence, type, strength and availability of clinical validation data. Pertaining to validation data, where available, we recorded the number of patients or studies included, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and/or receiver operating characteristic area under the curve, along with information on ground-truthing of use-cases. Data were analyzed with pivot tables and charts for descriptive statistics and trends." En bref issu de l'étude.
Rédacteur(s) de la fiche : Beesens TEAM
Introductio
1 - In tincidunt nunc ac velit tristique
- Pellentesque congue, magna elementum suscipit vestibulum
- Aenean eleifend sodales ipsum vitae consequat
- Quisque est leo tempus vel purus eu, placerat tincidunt nisl
2 - Sed lobortis elit vitae mollis consectetur
- In tincidunt nunc ac velit tristique
- Donec accumsan elit ac ornare eleifend
- Sed pellentesque suscipit quam ut finibus
- Fusce imperdiet neque sit amet ipsum ullamcorper scelerisque
3 - Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet
- Pellentesque congue, magna elementum suscipit vestibulum
- Aenean eleifend sodales ipsum vitae consequat
- Quisque est leo tempus vel purus eu, placerat tincidunt nisl
Conclusio
Pour accéder à ce contenu,
créez votre compte
gratuitement
Accéder à :
- L'ensemble de la veille e-santé sélectionnée
par la communauté Beesens, - Des documents de références de la e-santé,
- Et bien plus encore...
Déjà inscrit ? Identifiez-vous